Quality Assurance

DRAFT PAGE 27/04/2026

Quality Assurance

The Quality Assurance (QA) system of the Master’s Degree Programme in Mechatronics Engineering is implemented in accordance with the European Standards and Guidelines (ESG 2015) and the AVA3 framework defined by ANVUR.

The QA system ensures the continuous improvement of the programme through systematic monitoring, evaluation, and review of educational processes and outcomes.


Objectives

  • Ensure consistency between learning outcomes and teaching activities
  • Monitor student progression, performance, and satisfaction
  • Promote continuous improvement of teaching quality
  • Ensure transparency and accountability

QA Governance and Responsibilities

The QA system is managed through the following bodies:

  • Programme Coordinator – overall responsibility for QA processes
  • Quality Assurance Committee (AQ Group) – monitoring and coordination
  • Joint Student-Teacher Committee (CPDS) – evaluation of teaching quality
  • Review Group (Gruppo di Riesame) – preparation of monitoring reports
  • Course of Study Council (CCS) – approval of QA actions

QA Cycle (PDCA Model)

  • Plan: definition of objectives and learning outcomes
  • Do: implementation of teaching activities
  • Check: monitoring through indicators and student feedback
  • Act: definition of improvement actions

Monitoring and Indicators

  • Student enrolment trends
  • Dropout and completion rates
  • Graduate employment data
  • Student satisfaction surveys
  • Teaching evaluation results

Key QA Documents

All documents are publicly available to ensure transparency.


Student Involvement

  • Participation in the Joint Student-Teacher Committee (CPDS)
  • Completion of course evaluation questionnaires
  • Direct interaction with programme representatives

Transparency and Improvement Actions

The outcomes of QA activities are systematically analysed and translated into corrective and improvement actions.

The programme ensures public access to QA documentation and results in line with transparency requirements.

 


Contacts

For further information on Quality Assurance:

  • Programme Coordinator: Prof. Cristiano Maria Verrelli
    Email:
    verrelli@ing.uniroma2.it
  • Didactic Office: Simona Ranieri
    Email:
    simona.ranieri@uniroma2.it

Improvement Actions Monitoring

The following table summarises key improvement actions identified through the QA process and their current status.

Action Source Status* Notes
Improvement of course coordination among core subjects SMA 20xx Ongoing Regular coordination meetings were introduced among lecturers
Increase in student participation in evaluation surveys CPDS Report Implemented Awareness actions carried out during courses
Enhancement of internship opportunities Riesame Ciclico Planned New agreements with companies under evaluation
Monitoring of graduate employment outcomes SMA 2025 Ongoing Data analysis updated annually

*Status: Planned, Ongoing, Implemented, Under evaluation.

 

Quality Assurance (QA)

TAB DRAFT 27/04/2026 (POST)

QA Organization

Body Role Main Responsibilities
Programme Coordinator Academic leadership Ensures overall quality of the programme, coordinates QA processes and improvement actions
Quality Assurance Committee (AQ Group) QA management Monitors teaching quality, analyses indicators, and supports continuous improvement
Joint Student-Teacher Committee (CPDS) Student feedback Collects and evaluates student opinions and proposes improvements
Review Group (Gruppo di Riesame) Evaluation and reporting Prepares Annual Monitoring Reports and Periodic Review Reports
Course of Study Council (CCS) Decision-making Approves actions, regulations, and strategic decisions for the programme

QA Process (PDCA Cycle)

Phase Description Tools / Outputs
Plan Definition of learning outcomes and programme objectives SUA-CdS, Teaching Regulations
Do Delivery of teaching activities and services Courses, labs, internships
Check Monitoring of results and student satisfaction Student surveys, performance indicators
Act Implementation of corrective and improvement actions SMA, Review Reports

Key QA Documents

Document Description Frequency
SUA-CdS Official document describing the programme structure, objectives, and learning outcomes Annual update
Annual Monitoring Report (SMA) Analysis of key performance indicators and identification of critical issues Annual
Periodic Review Report Comprehensive evaluation of the programme and definition of improvement actions Every 3–5 years ??
Teaching Regulations Rules governing the programme structure and student career Updated when needed
Student Survey Results Feedback collected from students on teaching quality Each semester

4. Student Involvement

Activity Description Impact on QA
Course Evaluation Surveys Students provide feedback on courses and teaching Supports monitoring and improvement
Participation in CPDS Student representatives collaborate with faculty members Direct contribution to QA decisions
Meetings with Programme Representatives Direct interaction between students and programme management Helps identify issues and propose solutions

5. Indicators

Indicator Description Source
Graduation Rate Percentage of students completing the programme on time University database
Employment Rate Percentage of graduates employed after graduation AlmaLaurea
Student Satisfaction Average score from course evaluation surveys Student surveys
Dropout Rate Percentage of students leaving the programme University database

 

Improvement Actions Monitoring

The following table summarises key improvement actions identified through the QA process and their current status.

Action Source Status Notes
Improvement of course coordination among core subjects SMA 2024 Ongoing Regular coordination meetings were introduced among lecturers
Increase in student participation in evaluation surveys CPDS Report Implemented Awareness actions carried out during courses
Enhancement of internship opportunities Riesame Ciclico Planned New agreements with companies under evaluation
Monitoring of graduate employment outcomes SMA 2024 Ongoing Data analysis updated annually