Quality Assurance

DRAFT PAGE 27/04/2026

Quality Assurance

The Quality Assurance (QA) system of the Master’s Degree Programme in Mechatronics Engineering is implemented in accordance with the European Standards and Guidelines (ESG 2015) and the AVA3 framework defined by ANVUR.

The QA system ensures the continuous improvement of the programme through systematic monitoring, evaluation, and review of educational processes and outcomes.


Objectives

  • Ensure consistency between learning outcomes and teaching activities
  • Monitor student progression, performance, and satisfaction
  • Promote continuous improvement of teaching quality
  • Ensure transparency and accountability

QA Governance and Responsibilities

The QA system is managed through the following bodies:

  • Programme Coordinator – overall responsibility for QA processes
  • Quality Assurance Committee (AQ Group) – monitoring and coordination
  • Joint Student-Teacher Committee (CPDS) – evaluation of teaching quality
  • Review Group (Gruppo di Riesame) – preparation of monitoring reports
  • Course of Study Council (CCS) – approval of QA actions

QA Cycle (PDCA Model)

  • Plan: definition of objectives and learning outcomes
  • Do: implementation of teaching activities
  • Check: monitoring through indicators and student feedback
  • Act: definition of improvement actions

Monitoring and Indicators

  • Student enrolment trends
  • Dropout and completion rates
  • Graduate employment data
  • Student satisfaction surveys
  • Teaching evaluation results

Key QA Documents

All documents are publicly available to ensure transparency.


Student Involvement

  • Participation in the Joint Student-Teacher Committee (CPDS)
  • Completion of course evaluation questionnaires
  • Direct interaction with programme representatives

Transparency and Improvement Actions

The outcomes of QA activities are systematically analysed and translated into corrective and improvement actions.

The programme ensures public access to QA documentation and results in line with transparency requirements.

 


Contacts

For further information on Quality Assurance:

  • Programme Coordinator: Prof. Cristiano Maria Verrelli
    Email:
    verrelli@ing.uniroma2.it
  • Didactic Office: Simona Ranieri
    Email:
    simona.ranieri@uniroma2.it

Improvement Actions Monitoring

The following table summarises key improvement actions identified through the QA process and their current status.

Action Source Status* Notes
Improvement of course coordination among core subjects SMA 20xx Ongoing Regular coordination meetings were introduced among lecturers
Increase in student participation in evaluation surveys CPDS Report Implemented Awareness actions carried out during courses
Enhancement of internship opportunities Riesame Ciclico Planned New agreements with companies under evaluation
Monitoring of graduate employment outcomes SMA 2025 Ongoing Data analysis updated annually

*Status: Planned, Ongoing, Implemented, Under evaluation.

 

Quality Assurance (QA)

TAB DRAFT 27/04/2026 (POST)

QA Organization

Body Role Main Responsibilities
Programme Coordinator Academic leadership Ensures overall quality of the programme, coordinates QA processes and improvement actions
Quality Assurance Committee (AQ Group) QA management Monitors teaching quality, analyses indicators, and supports continuous improvement
Joint Student-Teacher Committee (CPDS) Student feedback Collects and evaluates student opinions and proposes improvements
Review Group (Gruppo di Riesame) Evaluation and reporting Prepares Annual Monitoring Reports and Periodic Review Reports
Course of Study Council (CCS) Decision-making Approves actions, regulations, and strategic decisions for the programme

QA Process (PDCA Cycle)

Phase Description Tools / Outputs
Plan Definition of learning outcomes and programme objectives SUA-CdS, Teaching Regulations
Do Delivery of teaching activities and services Courses, labs, internships
Check Monitoring of results and student satisfaction Student surveys, performance indicators
Act Implementation of corrective and improvement actions SMA, Review Reports

Key QA Documents

Document Description Frequency
SUA-CdS Official document describing the programme structure, objectives, and learning outcomes Annual update
Annual Monitoring Report (SMA) Analysis of key performance indicators and identification of critical issues Annual
Periodic Review Report Comprehensive evaluation of the programme and definition of improvement actions Every 3–5 years ??
Teaching Regulations Rules governing the programme structure and student career Updated when needed
Student Survey Results Feedback collected from students on teaching quality Each semester

4. Student Involvement

Activity Description Impact on QA
Course Evaluation Surveys Students provide feedback on courses and teaching Supports monitoring and improvement
Participation in CPDS Student representatives collaborate with faculty members Direct contribution to QA decisions
Meetings with Programme Representatives Direct interaction between students and programme management Helps identify issues and propose solutions

5. Indicators

Indicator Description Source
Graduation Rate Percentage of students completing the programme on time University database
Employment Rate Percentage of graduates employed after graduation AlmaLaurea
Student Satisfaction Average score from course evaluation surveys Student surveys
Dropout Rate Percentage of students leaving the programme University database

 

Improvement Actions Monitoring

The following table summarises key improvement actions identified through the QA process and their current status.

Action Source Status Notes
Improvement of course coordination among core subjects SMA 2024 Ongoing Regular coordination meetings were introduced among lecturers
Increase in student participation in evaluation surveys CPDS Report Implemented Awareness actions carried out during courses
Enhancement of internship opportunities Riesame Ciclico Planned New agreements with companies under evaluation
Monitoring of graduate employment outcomes SMA 2024 Ongoing Data analysis updated annually

 

 

Special Event: Meet the Artist – Ultimo at Tor Vergata at the end of May

Special Event: Meet the Artist – Ultimo at Tor Vergata at the end of May

Ahead of his concert on July 4th, 2026, the acclaimed singer Ultimo has expressed a special wish to meet the students of our University for an open discussion and debate.

The meeting will take place at the Auditorium Ennio Morricone towards the end of May. The discussion will focus on the future of the new generations and the role of musical culture in supporting young people’s growth, with a particular focus on urban peripheries.

How to Participate

Participation is limited to 50 students per Macroarea. To ensure a fair representation:

  • Selection: Each Degree Course Coordinator will select 3 to 4 students to represent their specific program.

  • Criteria: Selection will be based on interest in the topic and a mandatory gender equality requirement.

  • Deadline: Coordinators must submit the names of the selected students by the end of next week.

Streaming for All

Given the Auditorium’s limited capacity, we want to ensure everyone can be part of this conversation. Students who are not selected for in-person attendance will be able to follow the entire event via live streaming.

Further details regarding the exact date and streaming links will be provided soon.

DEADLINE: Send an email by 26 April to ranieri@ing.uniroma2.it

CCS – Course of Study Council

CCS – Course of Study Council

The Degree Program in Mechatronics Engineering has been active since the academic year 2017–2018, offering an interdisciplinary education that integrates mechanical engineering, electronics, control systems, and computer science.

In 2026, the Course of Study Council (CCS) was formally established to further strengthen the organization, coordination, and continuous improvement of the program.

The CCS plays a key role in overseeing academic activities, ensuring the quality of teaching, and promoting alignment with the evolving needs of industry and technological innovation.


MEETING CCS

DATAORDINE DEL GIORNOVERBALE
19/03/20261. Richiesta formale di afferenza al CCS.
2. Definizione Commissione valutazione competenze linguistiche docenti.
3. Aggiornamento Commissioni
4. Discussione azioni messe in atto post audit preliminare e documento di autovalutazione.
5. Implementazione del principio di frequenza obbligatoria per gli studenti di I anno.
6.Varie ed eventuali.
2026-1-CCS

Regolamento Didattico – Teaching Regulations

Regolamento Didattico – Teaching Regulations

Last “Regolamento Didattico approvato”

D.R. 3728/2025

D.R. 3159/2024

Italian – English version

Only the Italian version has been officially approved by the Rectoral Decree.

The English version of the “Regolamento Didattico” for the Master’s Degree in Mechatronics will be translated soon.

Art.1 – Norme generali – General Provisions

Art.2 – Ordinamento didattico

Art.3 – Scheda Unica Annuale del corso di Laurea Magistrale (SUA-CdS)

Art.4 – Gestione del corso di Laurea Magistrale

Art.5 – Comitato di Indirizzo

Art.6 – Ammissione al Corso

Art.7 – Programmazione e organizzazione della didattica

Art.8 – Trasparenza e assicurazione della Qualità

Art.9 – Piani delle attività formative

Art.10 – Verifiche del profitto

Art.11 – Prova finale – Final exam

Art.12 – Passaggi, trasferimenti, abbreviazioni di corso e riconoscimento crediti

Art.13 – Studenti a tempo parziale

Art.14 – Mobilita degli studenti e opportunità all’estero

Art.15 – Opportunità per gli studenti

Art.16 – Orientamento e tutorato

Art.17 – Tirocini curriculari e placement

Art.18 – Obblighi degli studenti

Art.19 – Disposizioni transitorie e finali

Art.1 –  General Provisions

Art.2 – Educational System

Art.3 – Single Annual Sheet of the Master’s Degree Program (SUA-CdS)

Art.4 – Management of the Master’s Degree Program

Art.5 – Advisory Committee

Art.6 – Admission to the Program

Art.7 – Planning and Organization of Teaching

Art.8 – Transparency and Quality Assurance

Art.9 – Study Plans

Art.10 – Assessment of Academic Performance

Art.11 – Final Examination

Art.12 – Transfers, Transitions, Course Abbreviations, and Credit Recognition

Art.13 – Part-Time Students

Art.14 – Student Mobility and International Opportunities

Art.15 – Opportunities for Students

Art.16 – Guidance and Tutoring

Art.17 – Curricular Internships and Placement

Art.18 – Student Obligations

Art.19 – Transitional and Final Provisions