UNIVERSITA' DEGLI STUDI ROMA "TOR VERGATA"TAB DRAFT 27/04/2026 (POST)
QA Organization
| Body | Role | Main Responsibilities |
|---|---|---|
| Programme Coordinator | Academic leadership | Ensures overall quality of the programme, coordinates QA processes and improvement actions |
| Quality Assurance Committee (AQ Group) | QA management | Monitors teaching quality, analyses indicators, and supports continuous improvement |
| Joint Student-Teacher Committee (CPDS) | Student feedback | Collects and evaluates student opinions and proposes improvements |
| Review Group (Gruppo di Riesame) | Evaluation and reporting | Prepares Annual Monitoring Reports and Periodic Review Reports |
| Course of Study Council (CCS) | Decision-making | Approves actions, regulations, and strategic decisions for the programme |
QA Process (PDCA Cycle)
| Phase | Description | Tools / Outputs |
|---|---|---|
| Plan | Definition of learning outcomes and programme objectives | SUA-CdS, Teaching Regulations |
| Do | Delivery of teaching activities and services | Courses, labs, internships |
| Check | Monitoring of results and student satisfaction | Student surveys, performance indicators |
| Act | Implementation of corrective and improvement actions | SMA, Review Reports |
Key QA Documents
| Document | Description | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
| SUA-CdS | Official document describing the programme structure, objectives, and learning outcomes | Annual update |
| Annual Monitoring Report (SMA) | Analysis of key performance indicators and identification of critical issues | Annual |
| Periodic Review Report | Comprehensive evaluation of the programme and definition of improvement actions | Every 3–5 years ?? |
| Teaching Regulations | Rules governing the programme structure and student career | Updated when needed |
| Student Survey Results | Feedback collected from students on teaching quality | Each semester |
4. Student Involvement
| Activity | Description | Impact on QA |
|---|---|---|
| Course Evaluation Surveys | Students provide feedback on courses and teaching | Supports monitoring and improvement |
| Participation in CPDS | Student representatives collaborate with faculty members | Direct contribution to QA decisions |
| Meetings with Programme Representatives | Direct interaction between students and programme management | Helps identify issues and propose solutions |
5. Indicators
| Indicator | Description | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Graduation Rate | Percentage of students completing the programme on time | University database |
| Employment Rate | Percentage of graduates employed after graduation | AlmaLaurea |
| Student Satisfaction | Average score from course evaluation surveys | Student surveys |
| Dropout Rate | Percentage of students leaving the programme | University database |
Improvement Actions Monitoring
The following table summarises key improvement actions identified through the QA process and their current status.
| Action | Source | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Improvement of course coordination among core subjects | SMA 2024 | Ongoing | Regular coordination meetings were introduced among lecturers |
| Increase in student participation in evaluation surveys | CPDS Report | Implemented | Awareness actions carried out during courses |
| Enhancement of internship opportunities | Riesame Ciclico | Planned | New agreements with companies under evaluation |
| Monitoring of graduate employment outcomes | SMA 2024 | Ongoing | Data analysis updated annually |
